I have had the Logitech C922 for a few weeks now and it does an amazing job! The picture is crystal clear, even with less light in my space. The autofocus is also very helpful, I don't need to do anything – it does its job on its own. It has helped me a lot both in meetings and in my streams.

Flawless image even in low light and even better with light, but what impressed me the most is the sound as you don't need to use a microphone at all to make videos on YouTube, its sound is impeccable and in editing you need minimal or no sound conversions, I've had it for almost a year and it does its job perfectly, truly a value for money camera

Purchase 10/04/2023: the first impression is very positive. I bought it mainly for video conferencing use. Amazing image quality and a microphone that picks up everything. I will come back to my comment in the future for further discussion!

For the money, it is excellent, I recommend it... only some batches have come out with faulty support base, but that doesn't mean anything, you can get another one for 1.50€ 2.00€

I have used it for Microsoft Teams as well as for online exams, without any problems. The tripod allows the camera to be securely attached without shaking. It produces high-quality image. It plays directly plug & play on Windows 10 Enterprise and Windows 11 Professional, without extra software installation.

I bought it today for about 75€ and I just had my first video call and I am very satisfied. It works perfectly on Windows 11. Plug and play.
Initially, I was thinking of buying a budget model just to get the job done, but in the end, I decided to get something better, so I chose the c922 (instead of the c270, for example). The image quality is very good in a well-lit room, but I haven't tested it in low light.
Among the participants in the video call (15 people), I had by far the best image quality!
Compared to the c920, I think they are almost the same, no significant difference, but I decided to get the 922 as a newer model since the price difference was 6-7€.

Pros:
Beautiful, good build quality, good image, tripod included, autofocus works well.

Cons:
I would have liked a nice case to carry it around without worrying about scratching the lens...

Very good camera, for professional use. It has relatively good software (Logitech Capture) with detailed settings and many capabilities. I use it with Windows 11, mainly for video conferences. Zoom and MS Teams recognize the software, but not Skype, which requires you to use its own basic settings. Overall, I am satisfied as it has nothing to do with the built-in cameras of laptops. I would like the software to have a little bit of skin smoothing, but we can't have it all.

For the intended use, the camera is excellent (Discord, teleconferences, etc).
The tripod is a bit short and I don't know any good use for it other than securing it to your screen, but it doesn't hurt to include it.
Its base for placement on the screen is excellent and it holds very well, it doesn't go anywhere.

It comes with a tripod! Good tripod, small but good! The lighting quality is great. In the dark, it's so-so... No problem even on Windows 11 that I have... It works perfectly. It doesn't have many settings to adjust... Good quality. It seems to withstand the test of time... after all, you won't constantly mess with it! You place it somewhere and let it do its job. It's worth its money and more!

Everything is fine, however, I consider it an expensive camera. The reason I bought it is for professional use. I work in an office with natural lighting next to a window, which creates difficult lighting conditions for a camera, so I "had to" resort to the expensive solution of Logitech. It is true that I tried 3 cameras with full HD resolution. The best in these conditions was the Logitech. Another very important advantage is the zoom capability, which is crucial for face-to-face video conferences with wide-angle high-resolution cameras, especially when the camera is positioned at a relatively greater distance from a laptop, for example, at a screen distance of about 70-80 cm. In this case, the "frame" captures a large area, resulting in us appearing small. This can be solved with third-party software such as SplitCam, but they consume extra resources.

After several models of web cameras, from all price ranges, features, and manufacturers, I ended up getting this specific one for both the office and home, and I am so satisfied!

- Just the fact that it comes with a good and user-friendly screen base and a tripod is enough to distinguish it, but it also has other positives.
- Long enough cable for placement on the screen, desk, or anywhere around the computer, even if the PC is on the floor and relatively far away.
- Many settings for almost every image and sound parameter.
- Wide-angle so it can be used as a "cheap" conferencing solution.
- Decent microphone, theoretically stereo, which doesn't make you sound like you fell into a well.

The only negatives are its relatively high price (although partially justified) and a strange habit of displaying "pulses" in the image, which are likely related to frequency and automatic lighting sensitivity, but fortunately can be eliminated by changing the image frequency or automatic lighting.

Beautiful construction, it came with a small desk tripod and I use it with that.
I don't think a longer cable is needed for a desk.
Very good image with dimmed lights and only lighting from the 2 desk screens.

I use it for video calls over the internet, both professional and personal. Good image, even in low lighting (when the object is poorly lit), good sound, and very convenient stand! It also has a small tripod. The accompanying software is a bit poor and boring in my opinion. Also, I would like it to have a lens cover, instead of having to buy one. Since I use it on a desktop, the cable is barely long enough for me. Pay attention to the room and object lighting because no matter how good the camera is, if the lighting is bad, strange shadows will appear on the face and the image will be accurate and faithful but aesthetically terrible. Also, adjust the white balance each time so that the colors don't come out strange and funny.

It was purchased for 125 euros from a well-known computer chain on 7/9/2020. Small stores have gone overboard with the prices of webcams. I managed to make a video and tested it with both light and low light, and the clarity is incredible. The program has the basic features, and you can even do recording from there without a watermark. If someone is starting now and wants to get involved with YouTube, it is beginner-friendly. If it wasn't for the chaos caused by COVID, it would be around 80 euros, which I would consider a good value for money. Anything over 180 euros is not worth it, so be patient for the prices to drop

Very good camera. Its resolution is above average for its price category, both in normal conditions and in low light conditions. The Logitech software is very good, with many image effects, various settings, and it also has the excellent auto chroma key feature, so you don't need to buy an extra green screen. If you want it for livestreaming, the only minor downside is that its base is of small height, I would prefer it to be taller. Anyway, if you want a good camera, it's worth increasing your budget and getting this tool.

I have it for about 1 year, its use for livestreams, YouTube, and other media is incredible. Many people who are just starting out recommend it. The only negatives I have with the camera are minor: initially, sometimes you will see something like a static black wave passing through the image, which can be fixed by going to the program's settings > advance settings > and changing from 60hz to 50hz. This happens due to lighting. 2. As for how it attaches to the screen, if you have a screen with a small piece of plastic, it may hide a small part of it. Other than these, the camera does its job very well and is perfect

I am a fan of Logitech products but I am also objective.
The 3 stars are given due to the quality-price ratio.
Coming from a VFM c270 which I was fully satisfied with, I expected to get a similar result based on the model's evolution and such a big price difference.
The sound seems to have a more limited frequency range and the noise cancellation function did not impress me.
The image has good colors, good performance in low light conditions but poor sharpness - clarity.
It also does not have good motion capture performance, which was perhaps better on the c270.
By connecting a decent smartphone to the PC and using the appropriate software to use the phone as a webcam, you will get better results.