This schema primarily inscribes the relationship of the subject with the Other. As it is constituted at the beginning of the analysis, it is the potential relation of speech [parole] through which the subject receives from the Other its own message, in the form of unconscious speech. This message is forbidden to the subject, who profoundly misunderstands it; it is a distorted, halted, and captive message due to the interference of the imaginary relation between a and a', between the ego and the other, who is its typical object. The imaginary relation, which is essentially an alienated relation, interrupts, slows down, suspends, and most often reverses and profoundly misunderstands the relation of speech between the subject and the Other, the big Other [with a capital A], who is another subject, a subject eminently capable of deception.
This schema is not introduced in psychoanalytic experience without reason, seeing how the latter is currently formulated by an increasing number of psychoanalysts, who make the object relation primary in psychoanalytic theory, without however commenting further on it. They focus on the dialectic of the pleasure principle and the reality principle, and base psychoanalytic progress on a rearrangement of the relation of the subject with the object—which is considered a dyadic relation—supposedly, they add referring to the psychoanalytic situation, extremely simple. Well, it is precisely this relation of the subject with the object, which increasingly tends to occupy the center of psychoanalytic theory, that we will put under examination.