Psychology Books

Η Σχέση Αντικειμένου

Author: Jacques Lacan

The title of the fourth seminar does not refer to any theory of object relations. The primary “object relation” of the speaking being, as emphasized by Sigmund Freud, is the relationship with the lost...

The title of the fourth seminar does not refer to any theory of object relations. The primary “object relation” of the speaking being, as emphasized by Sigmund Freud, is the relationship with the lost object, that is, with the absence of the object.

In the fourth seminar, this absence is shaped into three versions –privation, frustration, castration–...

See full description See full description

Description

Description

The title of the fourth seminar does not refer to any theory of object relations. The primary “object relation” of the speaking being, as emphasized by Sigmund Freud, is the relationship with the lost object, that is, with the absence of the object.

In the fourth seminar, this absence is shaped into three versions –privation, frustration, castration– depending on its actual, imaginary, or symbolic derivation. A privileged “object” –the phallus– is elevated to a signifier of absence and signifies the Aufhebung of the imaginary, that is, the symbolization of enjoyment and thus the separation from it.

This process of symbolization will be termed by Jacques Lacan “paternal transference,” because it will be linked to the effect exerted by the symbolic father, the Name-of-the-Father, on the insatiable and unbridled Desire of the Mother.

We are literally in the laboratory processing the paternal transference. Here, Lacan demonstrates in an unparalleled way that the fearful signifier –the horse that scares the little patient– takes the place of the Name-of-the-Father insofar as it allows the entire drive turmoil caused for little Hans by the libidinal play with the mother –especially when it is complicated by the arrival of a little sister and by the first pleasurable stirrings of his actual penis– to be subsumed into the symbolic order, the order of castration.

Thus, as Jacques-Alain Miller notes, the true title of the fourth seminar would be “The Function of Castration.” Despite its patriarchal culmination, however, the essential, constantly lurking focus of the fourth seminar concerns the mother.

Lacan deconstructs the so-called “simple” mother-child relationship and emphasizes that the mother acts as a bearer of symbolic gift, transforming the real object into a signifier of her desire. The latter remains insatiable and enigmatic, to the extent that a mother is also a woman, that is, a gendered being subjected to the phallic dialectic.

The way in which the child will be inscribed as a phallic substitute opens a wide field of clinical destinies, of neurotic or perverse character, which this book clarifies with timeless analyses. The mother, the father, castration – thanks to this thematic triptych, the fourth seminar emerges as the most representative document of the first “classical” period of Lacanian teaching.

Read an excerpt

This schema primarily inscribes the relationship of the subject with the Other. As it is constituted at the beginning of the analysis, it is the potential relation of speech [parole] through which the subject receives from the Other its own message, in the form of unconscious speech. This message is forbidden to the subject, who profoundly misunderstands it; it is a distorted, halted, and captive message due to the interference of the imaginary relation between a and a', between the ego and the other, who is its typical object. The imaginary relation, which is essentially an alienated relation, interrupts, slows down, suspends, and most often reverses and profoundly misunderstands the relation of speech between the subject and the Other, the big Other [with a capital A], who is another subject, a subject eminently capable of deception.

This schema is not introduced in psychoanalytic experience without reason, seeing how the latter is currently formulated by an increasing number of psychoanalysts, who make the object relation primary in psychoanalytic theory, without however commenting further on it. They focus on the dialectic of the pleasure principle and the reality principle, and base psychoanalytic progress on a rearrangement of the relation of the subject with the object—which is considered a dyadic relation—supposedly, they add referring to the psychoanalytic situation, extremely simple. Well, it is precisely this relation of the subject with the object, which increasingly tends to occupy the center of psychoanalytic theory, that we will put under examination.

Manufacturer

See full description

Specifications

Specifications

Product Guides

Book Excerpt

Author
Jacques Lacan
Publisher
PSychogios
Language
Greek
Cover
Soft
Number of Pages
496
Release Date
12/2021
Publication Date
2021
Dimensions
15.5x24 cm
ISBN-13
9789604531080

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

See all specifications

Description & Specifications

The title of the fourth seminar does not refer to any theory of object relations. The primary “object relation” of the speaking being, as emphasized by Sigmund Freud, is the relationship with the lost object, that is, with the absence of the object.

In the fourth seminar, this absence is shaped into three versions –privation, frustration, castration– depending on its actual, imaginary, or symbolic derivation. A privileged “object” –the phallus– is elevated to a signifier of absence and signifies the Aufhebung of the imaginary, that is, the symbolization of enjoyment and thus the separation from it.

This process of symbolization will be termed by Jacques Lacan “paternal transference,” because it will be linked to the effect exerted by the symbolic father, the Name-of-the-Father, on the insatiable and unbridled Desire of the Mother.

We are literally in the laboratory processing the paternal transference. Here, Lacan demonstrates in an unparalleled way that the fearful signifier –the horse that scares the little patient– takes the place of the Name-of-the-Father insofar as it allows the entire drive turmoil caused for little Hans by the libidinal play with the mother –especially when it is complicated by the arrival of a little sister and by the first pleasurable stirrings of his actual penis– to be subsumed into the symbolic order, the order of castration.

Thus, as Jacques-Alain Miller notes, the true title of the fourth seminar would be “The Function of Castration.” Despite its patriarchal culmination, however, the essential, constantly lurking focus of the fourth seminar concerns the mother.

Lacan deconstructs the so-called “simple” mother-child relationship and emphasizes that the mother acts as a bearer of symbolic gift, transforming the real object into a signifier of her desire. The latter remains insatiable and enigmatic, to the extent that a mother is also a woman, that is, a gendered being subjected to the phallic dialectic.

The way in which the child will be inscribed as a phallic substitute opens a wide field of clinical destinies, of neurotic or perverse character, which this book clarifies with timeless analyses. The mother, the father, castration – thanks to this thematic triptych, the fourth seminar emerges as the most representative document of the first “classical” period of Lacanian teaching.

Read an excerpt

This schema primarily inscribes the relationship of the subject with the Other. As it is constituted at the beginning of the analysis, it is the potential relation of speech [parole] through which the subject receives from the Other its own message, in the form of unconscious speech. This message is forbidden to the subject, who profoundly misunderstands it; it is a distorted, halted, and captive message due to the interference of the imaginary relation between a and a', between the ego and the other, who is its typical object. The imaginary relation, which is essentially an alienated relation, interrupts, slows down, suspends, and most often reverses and profoundly misunderstands the relation of speech between the subject and the Other, the big Other [with a capital A], who is another subject, a subject eminently capable of deception.

This schema is not introduced in psychoanalytic experience without reason, seeing how the latter is currently formulated by an increasing number of psychoanalysts, who make the object relation primary in psychoanalytic theory, without however commenting further on it. They focus on the dialectic of the pleasure principle and the reality principle, and base psychoanalytic progress on a rearrangement of the relation of the subject with the object—which is considered a dyadic relation—supposedly, they add referring to the psychoanalytic situation, extremely simple. Well, it is precisely this relation of the subject with the object, which increasingly tends to occupy the center of psychoanalytic theory, that we will put under examination.

Manufacturer

Product Guides

Book Excerpt

Author
Jacques Lacan
Publisher
PSychogios
Language
Greek
Cover
Soft
Number of Pages
496
Release Date
12/2021
Publication Date
2021
Dimensions
15.5x24 cm
ISBN-13
9789604531080

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

24,00 €
14,00 €   shipping cost