I had the Speedcross 3 for 5 years, they are not the same quality. The sole wore out after a year. Also, they smell very easily while the old model didn't notice. If the price drops, they will be worth it

Because they have a very sturdy structure, it requires a "shoehorn" to put the foot in

I had the black one, but this one is much more beautiful! Overall, the quality is Speedcross 5 GTX!

After 4 months of daily use, the sole has noticeably worn out! However, the color is worth it all!!
After 12 months of daily use, the sole has worn out a lot.. It remains a top choice due to its color.

Very soft shoe for both trails and everyday use in the city. They do not slip and their lacing system makes them easy to wear without getting tangled with laces and fasteners. With daily use, the sole has worn out in 1.5 years and needs replacement. This is the second pair I have purchased and now I will replace it with the third pair... The GTX is satisfactory overall, but it requires attention because if they get wet, the shoe will smell bad and will need deodorant.

Truly one of the best shoes one can get. I have had them for 3 years and use them daily, from hiking in the mountains to work. They are comfortable and lightweight, without causing any fatigue and without any trace of water inside the shoe, even on days with heavy rain. The only negative is indeed the sole, which wears relatively quickly due to the soft rubber. However, it also depends on the usage and how often one uses them. Overall, an excellent shoe.

Be careful with the terrain you will use them on, because they have "spikes" and reduced grip on wet bare rock.

I will evaluate them for exactly what they are made for, for mountain.
It is the 2nd pair of speedcross that I have (I also had the 4th) and I have to mention the following.
They have excellent grip on dry terrain on all surfaces. On wet terrain they are very good except for smooth surfaces (fallen tree trunks, large rocks).
However, where they excel is in downhill, no matter how fast it is.
I use them for mountain running and I have truly seen a difference compared to other models in how well you can guide them and what a wonderful brake they have. And believe me, I abuse them.
Now the truth is that because they have a soft rubber, there is wear and tear, but during their lifespan they perform perfectly, so the price is small.

Bought them in May and it's November now, and without much use they have worn out from the bottom. After quite a bit of use (walking for over an hour), they hit my heel and I always wear them with a sole (I don't wear them barefoot).

Among the best shoes for running and hiking on terrain with soil, rocks, and whatever an mountainous terrain includes. Simply after almost 4 months of almost daily similar use, the soles have significantly worn out and I would recommend immediately visiting a cobbler after purchase to place a leather lining inside the heel. And also, shoes from the same company and for the same intended use had exactly the same problems. As for the size, it needs to be slightly larger, maybe 1/3 or 2/3 larger than that of Nike. Otherwise, it is a very lightweight, comfortable, and convenient shoe that, however, does not withstand 1 year of regular mountainous use, despite being greatly improved from the previous model that had the same fate. Ergonomically, convenient, lightweight shoes that wear out quickly.

Attention to half a size or one more than what you wear. After 5 months of use, there is no change in the quality and comfort of this shoe, except that the heels have worn out as if they were used for 3 years. Perhaps it is due to the soft rubber it has. Used on flat terrain and minimal hiking to give you an idea of the use I had in this short period of time.

I haven't worn them much, but the impressions are very good. The feeling I have when I wear them cannot be compared to any other shoe I have worn. It is so pleasant that I would like to wear them as slippers inside the house. It would be unfair to do so for these specific shoes, of course. I bought them for walking, posture, and their appearance. I like them so much that I will probably start running in the mountains (to have an excuse to buy more pairs from this brand). I think you understand my enthusiasm. However, those who buy them for running should ignore my review because I am unfamiliar with the sport.

I should add that I tested them on wet smooth surfaces and there is absolutely no problem. They are just as slip-resistant as a regular shoe on such surfaces, so a little caution is needed, but it's nothing tragic.

Stay away guys, after 2 months of use, they lost their waterproofing and tore in the front... prefer last year's model, the non-GTX version, they easily lasted me 1 year of heavy use in rough terrain. They are not suitable for wet smooth surfaces

Wonderful shoe, I have been choosing it for the past three years from size 3 to 5, I highly recommend them, they even have satisfactory tolerance in cold weather.