Sport Shoes

Duramo Sport Shoes Running Core Black / Footwear White / Carbon Code: IF0566

Description & Specifications

These shoes combine a lightweight mesh upper that breathes, a Lightstrike midsole throughout for greater speed, and a durable outsole to help runners surpass themselves. 

See full description
The product is not available for shipping to the selected country.

Reviews (3)

Reviews

  1. 5 stars
    0
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4. 2 stars
    0
  5. 1 star
    0
Review this product
  • Comfort
  • They have the expected size
  • Value for money
  • Durability
  • They don't hit the foot
  • Weight
  • Construction quality

Reviews photos

Reviews photos
Reviews photos
Reviews photos
Reviews photos

Reviews by our members

  • Eaglos
    3
    1 out of 2 members found this review helpful

    EDIT 02/2026
    -
    After 1.5 years of use (walking), the shoes disintegrated and were thrown away. The insole is sewn into the shoe so you can't easily change it. The laces are garbage as they come undone for fun.

    Purchased on sale for 45 Euros. Foot length 27.5cm, minimal arch, wide instep and wide forefoot, weight 90kg. In terms of shape, the most correct and comfortable for my foot are Mizuno (44), followed by Asics (45), Puma (44.5), and in the background New Balance (45).

    With Adidas (and this particular one), for my foot and to fit my toes, I need a size 46 so the shoe is longer and the toes sit a bit further back, at the widest part. Theoretically, I should have taken 45 (45 1/3) which is more correct in length but the toes don't have space to spread out in front. The rest of the shoe is relatively narrow for my foot both at the heel and the midfoot.

    As for construction, for the 45 Euros I paid, they are obviously superior to similarly priced entry-level models (Nike, Reebok, Asics, New Balance). The fabric at the toes seems thin and gives the impression it won't last long so it needs care. Same with the fabric at the Achilles. The foam is Litestrike 1.0, meaning a slightly more advanced EVA that you find by the kilo.

    The use is for daily walking back and forth, about 25-30km per week. For running on a track, they don't inspire confidence, just like any other overpriced entry-level shoe.

    I would say that if the shape fits you well, up to 55-60 Euros it's "ok" as a purchase for walking and possibly light jogging. At almost 90 Euros, which is the list price, they are not worth it at all as at that price there are countless offers for superior models from many brands.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • ...I bought it but I haven't "run" it yet. I just wanted to write that for those who need a little wider width in the front part, it will be useful to buy half a size larger. I wear 42.5-42 2/3 and here I was comfortable with the 43 1/3.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • giannhstrunningshoes
    4
    8 out of 9 members found this review helpful

    Bought for 54 euros. Size 43 1/3 weighs 275 grams. I got it half a size bigger for it to be more comfortable. It is a shoe for short to medium distances. It has good fabric that allows the foot to breathe well, a free tongue, and a removable insole. The heel is not very hard. Now, the sole is not exactly suitable for heavy use, but it withstands and is worth its money. It has good quantity and proper material. Good grip and soft, stable without slipping. The absorption is decent with minimal rebound.

    Translated from Greek ·
    • Comfort
    • They have the expected size
    • Value for money
    • Durability
    • They don't hit the foot
    • Weight
    • Construction quality
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • EDIT 02/2026
    -
    After 1.5 years of use (walking), the shoes disintegrated and were thrown away. The insole is sewn into the shoe so you can't easily change it. The laces are garbage as they come undone for fun.

    Purchased on sale for 45 Euros. Foot length 27.5cm, minimal arch, wide instep and wide forefoot, weight 90kg. In terms of shape, the most correct and comfortable for my foot are Mizuno (44), followed by Asics (45), Puma (44.5), and in the background New Balance (45).

    With Adidas (and this particular one), for my foot and to fit my toes, I need a size 46 so the shoe is longer and the toes sit a bit further back, at the widest part. Theoretically, I should have taken 45 (45 1/3) which is more correct in length but the toes don't have space to spread out in front. The rest of the shoe is relatively narrow for my foot both at the heel and the midfoot.

    As for construction, for the 45 Euros I paid, they are obviously superior to similarly priced entry-level models (Nike, Reebok, Asics, New Balance). The fabric at the toes seems thin and gives the impression it won't last long so it needs care. Same with the fabric at the Achilles. The foam is Litestrike 1.0, meaning a slightly more advanced EVA that you find by the kilo.

    The use is for daily walking back and forth, about 25-30km per week. For running on a track, they don't inspire confidence, just like any other overpriced entry-level shoe.

    I would say that if the shape fits you well, up to 55-60 Euros it's "ok" as a purchase for walking and possibly light jogging. At almost 90 Euros, which is the list price, they are not worth it at all as at that price there are countless offers for superior models from many brands.

    Translated from Greek ·
    1
  • ...I bought it but I haven't "run" it yet. I just wanted to write that for those who need a little wider width in the front part, it will be useful to buy half a size larger. I wear 42.5-42 2/3 and here I was comfortable with the 43 1/3.

    Translated from Greek ·
    0
  • Bought for 54 euros. Size 43 1/3 weighs 275 grams. I got it half a size bigger for it to be more comfortable. It is a shoe for short to medium distances. It has good fabric that allows the foot to breathe well, a free tongue, and a removable insole. The heel is not very hard. Now, the sole is not exactly suitable for heavy use, but it withstands and is worth its money. It has good quantity and proper material. Good grip and soft, stable without slipping. The absorption is decent with minimal rebound.

    Translated from Greek ·
    8
  • See all

Description & Specifications

These shoes combine a lightweight mesh upper that breathes, a Lightstrike midsole throughout for greater speed, and a durable outsole to help runners surpass themselves. They are made from recycled materials.

Features:

  • Regular fit
  • Lace closure
  • Mesh upper
  • Stability and high responsiveness
  • Textile lining
  • Lightstrike shock-absorbing midsole
  • Midsole drop: 6.5 mm

SkuDescription|Brand

Product Number
IF0566
Style
Running
Gender
Men's
Colour
Blue
Popular Collections
Adidas Duramo
Fit
Normal
Insole
-
Midsole Technology
-
Drop
6.5 mm
Weight
-
Standing
-

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

Reviews (3)

  1. 5 stars
    0
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4. 2 stars
    0
  5. 1 star
    0
Review this product
  • Comfort
  • They have the expected size
  • Value for money
  • Durability
  • They don't hit the foot
  • Weight
  • Construction quality

Reviews photos

Reviews photos
Reviews photos
Reviews photos
Reviews photos

Reviews by our members

  • Eaglos
    3
    1 out of 2 members found this review helpful

    EDIT 02/2026
    -
    After 1.5 years of use (walking), the shoes disintegrated and were thrown away. The insole is sewn into the shoe so you can't easily change it. The laces are garbage as they come undone for fun.

    Purchased on sale for 45 Euros. Foot length 27.5cm, minimal arch, wide instep and wide forefoot, weight 90kg. In terms of shape, the most correct and comfortable for my foot are Mizuno (44), followed by Asics (45), Puma (44.5), and in the background New Balance (45).

    With Adidas (and this particular one), for my foot and to fit my toes, I need a size 46 so the shoe is longer and the toes sit a bit further back, at the widest part. Theoretically, I should have taken 45 (45 1/3) which is more correct in length but the toes don't have space to spread out in front. The rest of the shoe is relatively narrow for my foot both at the heel and the midfoot.

    As for construction, for the 45 Euros I paid, they are obviously superior to similarly priced entry-level models (Nike, Reebok, Asics, New Balance). The fabric at the toes seems thin and gives the impression it won't last long so it needs care. Same with the fabric at the Achilles. The foam is Litestrike 1.0, meaning a slightly more advanced EVA that you find by the kilo.

    The use is for daily walking back and forth, about 25-30km per week. For running on a track, they don't inspire confidence, just like any other overpriced entry-level shoe.

    I would say that if the shape fits you well, up to 55-60 Euros it's "ok" as a purchase for walking and possibly light jogging. At almost 90 Euros, which is the list price, they are not worth it at all as at that price there are countless offers for superior models from many brands.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • ...I bought it but I haven't "run" it yet. I just wanted to write that for those who need a little wider width in the front part, it will be useful to buy half a size larger. I wear 42.5-42 2/3 and here I was comfortable with the 43 1/3.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • giannhstrunningshoes
    4
    8 out of 9 members found this review helpful

    Bought for 54 euros. Size 43 1/3 weighs 275 grams. I got it half a size bigger for it to be more comfortable. It is a shoe for short to medium distances. It has good fabric that allows the foot to breathe well, a free tongue, and a removable insole. The heel is not very hard. Now, the sole is not exactly suitable for heavy use, but it withstands and is worth its money. It has good quantity and proper material. Good grip and soft, stable without slipping. The absorption is decent with minimal rebound.

    Translated from Greek ·
    • Comfort
    • They have the expected size
    • Value for money
    • Durability
    • They don't hit the foot
    • Weight
    • Construction quality
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • EDIT 02/2026
    -
    After 1.5 years of use (walking), the shoes disintegrated and were thrown away. The insole is sewn into the shoe so you can't easily change it. The laces are garbage as they come undone for fun.

    Purchased on sale for 45 Euros. Foot length 27.5cm, minimal arch, wide instep and wide forefoot, weight 90kg. In terms of shape, the most correct and comfortable for my foot are Mizuno (44), followed by Asics (45), Puma (44.5), and in the background New Balance (45).

    With Adidas (and this particular one), for my foot and to fit my toes, I need a size 46 so the shoe is longer and the toes sit a bit further back, at the widest part. Theoretically, I should have taken 45 (45 1/3) which is more correct in length but the toes don't have space to spread out in front. The rest of the shoe is relatively narrow for my foot both at the heel and the midfoot.

    As for construction, for the 45 Euros I paid, they are obviously superior to similarly priced entry-level models (Nike, Reebok, Asics, New Balance). The fabric at the toes seems thin and gives the impression it won't last long so it needs care. Same with the fabric at the Achilles. The foam is Litestrike 1.0, meaning a slightly more advanced EVA that you find by the kilo.

    The use is for daily walking back and forth, about 25-30km per week. For running on a track, they don't inspire confidence, just like any other overpriced entry-level shoe.

    I would say that if the shape fits you well, up to 55-60 Euros it's "ok" as a purchase for walking and possibly light jogging. At almost 90 Euros, which is the list price, they are not worth it at all as at that price there are countless offers for superior models from many brands.

    Translated from Greek ·
    1
  • ...I bought it but I haven't "run" it yet. I just wanted to write that for those who need a little wider width in the front part, it will be useful to buy half a size larger. I wear 42.5-42 2/3 and here I was comfortable with the 43 1/3.

    Translated from Greek ·
    0
  • Bought for 54 euros. Size 43 1/3 weighs 275 grams. I got it half a size bigger for it to be more comfortable. It is a shoe for short to medium distances. It has good fabric that allows the foot to breathe well, a free tongue, and a removable insole. The heel is not very hard. Now, the sole is not exactly suitable for heavy use, but it withstands and is worth its money. It has good quantity and proper material. Good grip and soft, stable without slipping. The absorption is decent with minimal rebound.

    Translated from Greek ·
    8
  • See all