CPU Processors

Intel Ultra 9 285K 3.7GHz Processor 24 Core for Socket 1851 in Box

Key features:

  • Threads: 24
  • Max Frequency: 5.7 GHz
  • Intel Core Ultra (series 2)
  • Cache Memory: 36 MB
See full description
  • See all

Description

Description

The Intel Ultra 9 285K processor is based on the Arrow Lake microarchitecture (2024).

It features:

  • 24 cores with 24 Threads
  • Maximum frequency of 5.5 GHz
  • Cache memory of 36 MB
  • Socket 1851

More cores provide increased power in programs that take advantage of the presence of a larger number of cores. Threads allow the processor to execute multiple applications simultaneously, completing tasks faster. Cache memory is a very important feature as the larger it is, the less time is required for the processor to retrieve data from the computer's main memory, significantly boosting performance. Finally, it will need to be housed in a motherboard with a corresponding Socket and does not include a cooler. You will need to purchase a separate cooler for the processor, which is essential.

Comparison with the Previous Generation

The Intel Core Ultra (series 2) have 40% reduced power consumption compared to the previous generation Raptor Lake. Provides increased IPC performance (Instructions per Clock) up to 9% on cores and 32% on threads.

New Intel 800 Series Chipset

The Intel Core Ultra 200S series processors, combined with the new Intel 800 Series chipset, expand platform compatibility, providing up to 24 PCIe 4.0 lanes, 8 SATA 3.0 ports, and 10 USB 3.2 ports. These capabilities allow users to leverage the most modern connectivity, storage, and other function technologies.

Intel AI Optimization

Allowing faster execution and more efficient resource utilization for demanding AI tasks, it offers up to 50% increased performance.

Manufacturer

See full description

Specifications

Specifications

Main Specifications

Year of Release
2024
Family
Ultra 9
Microarchitecture
Arrow Lake
Socket
1851
Packaging
Box
Compatible Chipset
-
Type
High Performance

Performance

Cores
24
Threads
24
Processor Frequency (Base Frequency)
3.7 GHz
Max Processor Frequency
5.7 GHz
Cache memory
36 MB
Unlocked
Yes
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 W

Features & Functions

Includes Heatsink
No

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

See all specifications

Reviews (14)

Reviews

  1. 11
  2. 4 stars
    0
  3. 3 stars
    0
  4. 1
  5. 2
Review this product
  • Speed
  • Multitasking
  • Temperature
  • Value for money
  • Stayros_Katirtzoglou
    5
    5 out of 53 members found this review helpful

    Is the Intel Ultra 9 285K good for gaming?
    This is impressive, but with the easy or negative gains in gaming performance, it's hard to recommend the Ultra 9 285K right now if your main goal is gaming. The Ryzen 9 9950X has much more consistent performance and would be a more reasonable choice. 24 Oct 2024

    Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K better than the 288V?
    Both CPUs were released (or underwent first-class testing) within the past year, but the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is significantly slower in multi-threaded tests (CPU Mark). The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is about -15% slower in single-threaded tests.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • George_T8083
    5
    24 out of 70 members found this review helpful

    A great upgrade for me after the issues I had with the Ryzen 9 9950X regarding temperatures, I can finally do my job like a normal person. We're talking about a beast that doesn't back down from anything. You might say at this price it's expected...

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • venge
    2
    40 out of 68 members found this review helpful

    I was eagerly waiting for this CPU, as I luckily avoided buying the 13th or 14th, and although I am an Intel fanboy, my disappointment knows no bounds... The release was tragic, worse performance than the 14700k in many games, and in productivity, it’s not that relevant compared to the 14900k... I can't figure out who this chip is aimed at. Probably for those who want to say they have an Intel flagship and get top scores in Cinebench. Should I say it has some amazing power efficiency to be relevant for businesses? Should I say I will install it now and upgrade to the next generation? Since they will kill the 1851. Look for YouTube reviews and benchmarks, and you will understand.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • ioannakodesign
    1
    47 out of 77 members found this review helpful

    The fact that nobody buys it worldwide and they have it at such a price surpasses me... Kudos to Intel. Terrible chip for gaming. All they did was reduce power consumption resulting in terrible performance, of course. However, for productivity, it is a very good chip. If they hadn't changed the platform and it was just a continuation of their 14 series, then it would make sense. Now you have to buy a brand new expensive motherboard and of course these awful overpriced chips. Oh, and let me not forget that they will change the platform after this generation, so whoever buys it cannot upgrade in the future... Stay away from this entire generation. Intel is self-destructing

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 5
    0 out of 5 members found this review helpful

    Verified purchase

    This review is about the packaging: Tray

    Could Have been packaged better simply by taping the CPU to the foam in the box but all works ok.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 5
    7 out of 54 members found this review helpful

    Amazing processor

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • Verified purchase

  • Verified purchase

    • Speed
    • Multitasking
    • Temperature
    • Value for money
  • Verified purchase

  • 5
    Store representative

    Verified purchase

  • Verified purchase

  • Verified purchase

    This review is about the packaging: Tray

  • Is the Intel Ultra 9 285K good for gaming?
    This is impressive, but with the easy or negative gains in gaming performance, it's hard to recommend the Ultra 9 285K right now if your main goal is gaming. The Ryzen 9 9950X has much more consistent performance and would be a more reasonable choice. 24 Oct 2024

    Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K better than the 288V?
    Both CPUs were released (or underwent first-class testing) within the past year, but the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is significantly slower in multi-threaded tests (CPU Mark). The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is about -15% slower in single-threaded tests.

    Translated from Greek ·
    5
  • A great upgrade for me after the issues I had with the Ryzen 9 9950X regarding temperatures, I can finally do my job like a normal person. We're talking about a beast that doesn't back down from anything. You might say at this price it's expected...

    Translated from Greek ·
    24
  • I was eagerly waiting for this CPU, as I luckily avoided buying the 13th or 14th, and although I am an Intel fanboy, my disappointment knows no bounds... The release was tragic, worse performance than the 14700k in many games, and in productivity, it’s not that relevant compared to the 14900k... I can't figure out who this chip is aimed at. Probably for those who want to say they have an Intel flagship and get top scores in Cinebench. Should I say it has some amazing power efficiency to be relevant for businesses? Should I say I will install it now and upgrade to the next generation? Since they will kill the 1851. Look for YouTube reviews and benchmarks, and you will understand.

    Translated from Greek ·
    40
  • The fact that nobody buys it worldwide and they have it at such a price surpasses me... Kudos to Intel. Terrible chip for gaming. All they did was reduce power consumption resulting in terrible performance, of course. However, for productivity, it is a very good chip. If they hadn't changed the platform and it was just a continuation of their 14 series, then it would make sense. Now you have to buy a brand new expensive motherboard and of course these awful overpriced chips. Oh, and let me not forget that they will change the platform after this generation, so whoever buys it cannot upgrade in the future... Stay away from this entire generation. Intel is self-destructing

    Translated from Greek ·
    47
  • Could Have been packaged better simply by taping the CPU to the foam in the box but all works ok.

    Translated from Greek ·
    0
  • See all

Description & Specifications

The Intel Ultra 9 285K processor is based on the Arrow Lake microarchitecture (2024).

It features:

  • 24 cores with 24 Threads
  • Maximum frequency of 5.5 GHz
  • Cache memory of 36 MB
  • Socket 1851

More cores provide increased power in programs that take advantage of the presence of a larger number of cores. Threads allow the processor to execute multiple applications simultaneously, completing tasks faster. Cache memory is a very important feature as the larger it is, the less time is required for the processor to retrieve data from the computer's main memory, significantly boosting performance. Finally, it will need to be housed in a motherboard with a corresponding Socket and does not include a cooler. You will need to purchase a separate cooler for the processor, which is essential.

Comparison with the Previous Generation

The Intel Core Ultra (series 2) have 40% reduced power consumption compared to the previous generation Raptor Lake. Provides increased IPC performance (Instructions per Clock) up to 9% on cores and 32% on threads.

New Intel 800 Series Chipset

The Intel Core Ultra 200S series processors, combined with the new Intel 800 Series chipset, expand platform compatibility, providing up to 24 PCIe 4.0 lanes, 8 SATA 3.0 ports, and 10 USB 3.2 ports. These capabilities allow users to leverage the most modern connectivity, storage, and other function technologies.

Intel AI Optimization

Allowing faster execution and more efficient resource utilization for demanding AI tasks, it offers up to 50% increased performance.

Manufacturer

Main Specifications

Year of Release
2024
Family
Ultra 9
Microarchitecture
Arrow Lake
Socket
1851
Packaging
Box
Compatible Chipset
-
Type
High Performance

Performance

Cores
24
Threads
24
Processor Frequency (Base Frequency)
3.7 GHz
Max Processor Frequency
5.7 GHz
Cache memory
36 MB
Unlocked
Yes
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 W

Features & Functions

Includes Heatsink
No

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

Reviews (14)

  1. 11
  2. 4 stars
    0
  3. 3 stars
    0
  4. 1
  5. 2
Review this product
  • Speed
  • Multitasking
  • Temperature
  • Value for money
  • Stayros_Katirtzoglou
    5
    5 out of 53 members found this review helpful

    Is the Intel Ultra 9 285K good for gaming?
    This is impressive, but with the easy or negative gains in gaming performance, it's hard to recommend the Ultra 9 285K right now if your main goal is gaming. The Ryzen 9 9950X has much more consistent performance and would be a more reasonable choice. 24 Oct 2024

    Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K better than the 288V?
    Both CPUs were released (or underwent first-class testing) within the past year, but the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is significantly slower in multi-threaded tests (CPU Mark). The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is about -15% slower in single-threaded tests.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • George_T8083
    5
    24 out of 70 members found this review helpful

    A great upgrade for me after the issues I had with the Ryzen 9 9950X regarding temperatures, I can finally do my job like a normal person. We're talking about a beast that doesn't back down from anything. You might say at this price it's expected...

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • venge
    2
    40 out of 68 members found this review helpful

    I was eagerly waiting for this CPU, as I luckily avoided buying the 13th or 14th, and although I am an Intel fanboy, my disappointment knows no bounds... The release was tragic, worse performance than the 14700k in many games, and in productivity, it’s not that relevant compared to the 14900k... I can't figure out who this chip is aimed at. Probably for those who want to say they have an Intel flagship and get top scores in Cinebench. Should I say it has some amazing power efficiency to be relevant for businesses? Should I say I will install it now and upgrade to the next generation? Since they will kill the 1851. Look for YouTube reviews and benchmarks, and you will understand.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • ioannakodesign
    1
    47 out of 77 members found this review helpful

    The fact that nobody buys it worldwide and they have it at such a price surpasses me... Kudos to Intel. Terrible chip for gaming. All they did was reduce power consumption resulting in terrible performance, of course. However, for productivity, it is a very good chip. If they hadn't changed the platform and it was just a continuation of their 14 series, then it would make sense. Now you have to buy a brand new expensive motherboard and of course these awful overpriced chips. Oh, and let me not forget that they will change the platform after this generation, so whoever buys it cannot upgrade in the future... Stay away from this entire generation. Intel is self-destructing

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 5
    0 out of 5 members found this review helpful

    Verified purchase

    This review is about the packaging: Tray

    Could Have been packaged better simply by taping the CPU to the foam in the box but all works ok.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 5
    7 out of 54 members found this review helpful

    Amazing processor

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • Verified purchase

  • Verified purchase

    • Speed
    • Multitasking
    • Temperature
    • Value for money
  • Verified purchase

  • 5
    Store representative

    Verified purchase

  • Verified purchase

  • Verified purchase

    This review is about the packaging: Tray

  • Is the Intel Ultra 9 285K good for gaming?
    This is impressive, but with the easy or negative gains in gaming performance, it's hard to recommend the Ultra 9 285K right now if your main goal is gaming. The Ryzen 9 9950X has much more consistent performance and would be a more reasonable choice. 24 Oct 2024

    Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K better than the 288V?
    Both CPUs were released (or underwent first-class testing) within the past year, but the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is significantly slower in multi-threaded tests (CPU Mark). The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is about -15% slower in single-threaded tests.

    Translated from Greek ·
    5
  • A great upgrade for me after the issues I had with the Ryzen 9 9950X regarding temperatures, I can finally do my job like a normal person. We're talking about a beast that doesn't back down from anything. You might say at this price it's expected...

    Translated from Greek ·
    24
  • I was eagerly waiting for this CPU, as I luckily avoided buying the 13th or 14th, and although I am an Intel fanboy, my disappointment knows no bounds... The release was tragic, worse performance than the 14700k in many games, and in productivity, it’s not that relevant compared to the 14900k... I can't figure out who this chip is aimed at. Probably for those who want to say they have an Intel flagship and get top scores in Cinebench. Should I say it has some amazing power efficiency to be relevant for businesses? Should I say I will install it now and upgrade to the next generation? Since they will kill the 1851. Look for YouTube reviews and benchmarks, and you will understand.

    Translated from Greek ·
    40
  • The fact that nobody buys it worldwide and they have it at such a price surpasses me... Kudos to Intel. Terrible chip for gaming. All they did was reduce power consumption resulting in terrible performance, of course. However, for productivity, it is a very good chip. If they hadn't changed the platform and it was just a continuation of their 14 series, then it would make sense. Now you have to buy a brand new expensive motherboard and of course these awful overpriced chips. Oh, and let me not forget that they will change the platform after this generation, so whoever buys it cannot upgrade in the future... Stay away from this entire generation. Intel is self-destructing

    Translated from Greek ·
    47
  • Could Have been packaged better simply by taping the CPU to the foam in the box but all works ok.

    Translated from Greek ·
    0
  • See all
556,68 €
14,00 €   shipping cost