I was hesitant about giving 5 stars, not because of performance but because of the price, which is +150 euros more than the price I bought it for 2-3 months ago. The card is very good, it plays the vast majority of games on ultra. Now, if you want to run games with technologies like path tracing, you'll push it quite a bit. Of course, it will run them with DLSS and frame regeneration, but the issue is that it introduces quite a bit of 'blurriness.' Naturally, path tracing is a very demanding technology (for example, Cyberpunk drops my FPS by 25!). At 440 euros, which is what I paid, it was an okay choice. Neither bad nor great (back then, the 9060xt was 360!). I chose Nvidia because of DLSS and CUDA for programming?! (maybe I just found another excuse for this purchase). At 600 euros, where the price has gone now, I wouldn't buy it... I'd eat pasta and get a 9070xt or 5070 ti... Almost double the money, but better value for money. (always considering the money you spend proportionally). Attention to those with AM4 motherboards without PCI4. Nvidia has put in PCIx8 lanes (if I'm saying it right). This means that if you run out of the card's VRAM, you'll experience intense spikes as the card will seek extra power from the RAM, and PCI3 is much worse at handling this than PCI4. Of course, by 2026, I don't think there will be a game that exceeds 16 GB VRAM