The issue of Homeric Ithaca has not yet been resolved; we do not know which Ithaca belongs to Odysseus, nor who Homer was, or when he lived and composed the epics. The astonishing information and details of the Homeric poems "shout out" for the identity of Homer and Odysseus. An intellectual-professorial Establishment existed in antiquity, as it does today; even the Ionian dialect was incorporated into the epics. Herodotus and Thucydides consider Homer to be post-Trojan War. Pausanias avoids dating Homer, fearing the consequences; only Aristotle considers him "recent" relative to the founding of Memphis. The Parium Chronicle (or "book of the Establishment") dates the Trojan War to around 1200 BC. We observe many discrepancies-errors among our ancient authors precisely due to Homer's antiquity. I believe that it refers to a very ancient era, much earlier than the second millennium BC. The presence of the Greeks in the remote antiquity, which has been "blocked" or deliberately taught through the "Indo-European" theory, prompts us to focus the study of related events and personalities in a greater historical depth, from the fourth to the sixth millennium BC. The geographical description by Odysseus of Ithaca appears to lead to a "dead-end," because the very ancient Homer saw a different geography in that region of the Ionian Sea; both in relation to what the ancient geographer Strabo observed and to our contemporary distinguished architect-archaeologist Daisypfendt. The first "key" to our new theory is that Homer-Odysseus does not know Acarnania. A geological investigation is required to prove if and when the "long island" Dulichium was islanded and subsequently called Acarnania. The second "key" is the dating of the deluge of Dardanus, the ancestor of the Trojans; because Homer speaks of the authentic first Troy-Ilion, founded by the grandson and great-grandson of Dardanus.