Regarding the composition of the present book, the following points could be noted:
1. This is a "research proposal," initially approved in an international "Philosophy competition," which will be funded upon the completion of the relevant text, that is, the main "deliverable." With the success of such a process, it is likely that Bourdieu, who argued that every "research program" should be evaluated retrospectively and only then funded, will be "vindicated"…
2. In a timeframe of three weeks, nine female and nine male graduate students participated without "tuition fees" (by decision of the Department and the Division, without waiting for the Senate).
3. In any case, the problematization does not promise to turn us all, during the processes of role "switching," into "research consumers," especially when we are interested in what continues to be called "University." As for the diary format of the text, it simply assists in the individual sectioning and thus ensures the overall structure of this book.
