Critics, both professional and amateur, have played a restraining role with their activity in the field of criticism. Works are contextualized, which allows the critic to make them their own, from what they have memorized, as similar creations are not available in stores. The job of criticism is difficult and very beneficial when done correctly. It's a vicious cycle, as it seems that creators must diminish in order for their critics to thrive, and writers transform into critics to critique their own works. This creates issues that must resist the judgments imposed by critics.

Critics never seem to be concerned with the anxiety of the creator when they are applauded for a work they do not appreciate. This anxiety is a significant issue that relates to the value of critical research. Important in all of this is the role of the reader, this precious ally of the artist, who chooses the works and protects them from the critics.

The reading public, as in other times, has often brought to light the buried works. However, the public must first acquire the ability to read and not be distorted by rules, to be properly educated in order to maintain the proper perception of aesthetics. A significant issue that also deserves attention.

Mélpo Axioti

Excerpt from the article "Poetry and Its Adventures" in the Art Review, Issue 93, September 1962, found in the COMPLETE WORKS, VOL. VI.