The subject being judged here is the following working assumption: the generation of the '30s, with the essay at its forefront, represents a particular parameter, emerged as a generation of ideas and had as its leader or public representative and thus timeless and passionate defender the George Theotokas (1905-1966) who expresses its ideology and feeds its mythology.

What reaches us today as a cultural formation and ideology or as a cultural ideology, a fact that requires a more imaginative reconfiguration of the cultural narrative of the generation of the '30s and the cultural process of production, representation, and perpetuation of its myth as a constitutive and fictitious narrative.

In short, if the research lens had turned towards the collaboration of aesthetics, ideology, and politics, then what should have been taken into account -more geometrico-? (within the context of a counter-proposal for organizing the present research, which is, of course, also subject to verification).

[Excerpt from the text on the back cover of the edition]