For standing work, a season in taverns and such tough jobs, you won't find anything better.. also positive that they dry relatively quickly and don't get ruined in the washing machine at low temperature.. in terms of durability and build quality, also quite good and sturdy.. generally, I bought them for the second time!

First impressions: nice stepping feel, elegant design, very lightweight. I will update after using it.

It took me a week for them to take the shape of my foot, but after the first few days the shoes are incredibly comfortable!

I should note that I got them for work involving standing and explosive movements (bar) and not for running, which is their intended purpose!

I got them for standing work, I am a waiter and until now I hadn't tried "expensive" shoes (I usually spent up to about 70+ €, where the best were usually Reebok or Adidas). So, when you always hold the tray with your left hand and many shifts often exceed 13 hours, certain parts of your body get much more strained and the job really breaks you with pain... I really noticed a difference with this shoe, I don't think I'll ever work with cheap ones again. As for build quality, they are ok, they last longer than anything I've had so far. They are lightweight. For washing, I put them in the washing machine at a low temperature and they dry very quickly, and the shape etc. wasn't altered at all. So for 120€, I think they're worth it and I'm 99% sure I'll buy them again!

Light, comfortable, soft, with very good shock absorption.
BUT, two (2) pairs that I bought at different times gave me problems.
The first pair, within a year, both shoes came unglued, on both sides, externally and internally, at the base of the sole where it joins the fabric. Used for coffee, walking, and very little running in the city.
With the second pair, the black part of the sole came unglued in 2 months, as shown in the photo I uploaded. Used only for coffee and strolling.
2 out of 2, I don't consider it a coincidence.
Unjustifiable for the money and the brand name.
Unacceptable build quality, which undermines the very good features of the shoe.
Here, you DON'T get what you pay for!

After the Pegasus (37 if I'm not mistaken), they seemed very comfortable to me. I had bought Hoka in the past for longer distances and they did not disappoint me. Very nice shoes once again and they have also improved the appearance.

The black part of the sole came off and continues to come off even with simple use on a small court. The upper part is perfectly comfortable and the color is nice, but something has gone very wrong with the glue in the construction

The store was great with delivery time and processing. The two stars are for the product. Hoka is not producing great quality shoes anymore.

The shoes are truly incredibly comfortable — both when standing, walking, and running. Unfortunately, however, their build quality is very poor.

Although I had read several negative reviews, I decided to buy them believing that perhaps they were exaggerated. In the end, within a very short period of time, I also noticed the same problems that most people mention.

Even though I didn't use them daily and I'm generally quite careful with my athletic shoes, this particular pair was completely ruined within 4 months. Specifically:

The insole came unglued in various places.

The side of the shoe has visibly worn out and looks heavily used, without having been subjected to any particular strain.

The upper part of the shoe has opened in two different places.

It's really a shame, because in terms of fit and comfort they are excellent. However, their durability does not meet expectations in the slightest. I will be very cautious with this company from now on...

I almost never write reviews, but...to protect others...The worst thing ever...my knees hurt incredibly, for no reason!!! I even went to a doctor and the only thing he didn't tell me was that the shoes were to blame..As soon as I changed shoes, the pain was gone. Not worth it at all! Money thrown away.

I mainly use them for long runs and I have done up to 26 km with these particular shoes. On hot days they get quite warm as they are thicker than other shoes, but without causing discomfort. On my feet, all hoka shoes fit just fine, but I know they don't suit everyone so you might need to try them on. For amateur running, I consider them very fair for their price. I have definitely done 150 km with these and I am quite satisfied so far, and they don't seem to have lost their shape. I haven't tried other brands mainly because of the prices on the market, but generally, many people recommend these shoes for heavier athletes. I myself weigh 98 kilos so I can say they really are comfortable. As an owner of the rincon 3 and 4, I see the difference especially when I do many kilometers in one training session. Obviously, if someone is chasing performance, they should look for something more expensive.

First time I bought Hoka and after seeing reviews and such, instead of 46 I got them in 46 2/3… They are relatively okay in size. Light shoe and quite comfortable.
I got them for my job (service) and after four months they have opened up both at the bottom and on the sides. They are definitely NOT worth their money

Two months after purchase, worn only a few times, the sole came off on an asphalt road, not even on dirt. Unacceptable value for money

Beautiful, comfortable, very soft, stable, they seem sensitive to time and heavy use. Quite expensive for what they are.

Excellent shoe for those who have outward pronation (underpronation), as it is reinforced on the outer part of the sole, resulting in the foot being pushed inward. Extremely lightweight and soft to step on, like walking on a cloud. I use them for everyday casual use; I don't have an opinion yet for exercise and workouts.

Perfect shoe, the best I've ever had, for walking and running. Be careful with their use, they are quite sensitive. Do not do farm work, do not kick doors, do not kick rough, hard, or sharp surfaces when wearing them.

Nice shoe but buy 1 size up from your own if you want to go for a half marathon and marathon because 2 of my toenails turned black

Owner of all Asics Novablast until recently, I decided to try them. Differences: they are more compact in width, so I take shorter steps because with the Novablast I stepped a bit wider due to the large sole at the back. In terms of absorption, it doesn't seem to be the same, probably has less, but it is definitely more stable and one with the foot. I run 10-15km and didn't feel them at the end, they are light. Only downside is the heat, it doesn't have ideal ventilation.

Beautiful, featherlight, and perhaps the most comfortable running shoes (I run up to 10km) that I have ever worn. They don't give a foot massage! I say this even though I come from years with Saucony! I wear them for cross training at the gym, etc. Personally, I find them airy and my foot breathes very well. As for the size, they have a regular fit. For example, I wear 43 1/3 in Stan Smith, the same here. Essentially, whatever size I generally wear in sneakers

The two stars go for comfort and appearance. Otherwise, after 1.5 years of use, I have to say they have worn out a lot, especially on the sole, the black plastic parts have come off. Also, from the first day I wore them, they smell bad every time after use. I will not choose this brand again. Extremely overpriced for what they offer.

I work for Skroutz last mile as a driver, I am 140 kg ( 280 lbs. ) and I feel super light and fast to run distances between stops to deliver packages.

Unfortunately, the very next day after a few kilometers of walking, they caused me problems with my ankle, and since then it has been bothering me quite a bit. Unfortunately, they do not have a stable footing, resulting in my foot swaying when I step, and this movement has created problems with my ankle, at least for me

Excellent, the only downside is its price; it is very expensive, ranging from 108 euros to 195. When you find it for 108, prefer it; I recommend it with reservations. It has a narrow fit, so you need to get it 1.5 sizes larger than what the Nike sizes are

Very good application and comfortable for running
Half a size up from the corresponding NIKE
Used in the gym and outdoor running
In two months with use 3/7 it is like new

Used for over 9 months but now I only have them for walking. They quickly lost their absorbent capacity. However, they are extremely durable in terms of fabric. For running compared to lower-tier and lower-priced Saucony... they are more stable, more resistant to wear, but in terms of comfort and durability during training, they are inferior and much more expensive (overpriced)

The best running shoe I have tried. However, I am comparing it to lower-cost footwear. They are comfortable and provide tremendous propulsion and stability to the point where I feel much more comfortable in my feet during and after running. I run at least 5 km a day and my previous ones lasted for a significant amount of time. They could be cheaper.

Try before you buy. It takes some kilometers for it to mold to your foot. At first, I was upset, now I wouldn't change them

The only negative is the price, which is outrageous; they are overpriced. They seem to be good quality, but for me, with wide feet at the toes, they are narrow, just like the Nikes; the Adidas fit me better. I had to get a larger size to be comfortable, so you should know to take one and a half sizes larger than you wear in Nike. I got it for the price of €119; I still think it is very expensive. Sometimes it drops to €107, but at the price of €160, it is price gouging; they sell it for whatever they want. I will come back after a few days of use; it is an amazing lift, especially at the back of the heel. You think it has a cushioning effect; it feels great. You should wait for them to drop to the price of €107, not €150, even €200; I think that is outrageous. The only thing I am not sure about is how long they will last over time

Keep in mind that they have a wide fit. I mean that while I wear size 48 in other shoes, I comfortably wear size 47 in these!